Skip to main content

RATIONAL DECISION MAKING [MIS}


A rational decision is the one which, effectively and efficiently, ensures the achievement of the goal for which the decision is made. If it is raining, it is rational to look for a cover so that you do not get wet. If you are in business and want to make profit, then you must produce goods and sell them at a price higher than the cost of production. In reality, there is no right or wrong decision but a rational or an irrational decision. The quality of decision making is to be judged on the rationality and not necessarily on the result it produces. The rationality of the decision made is not the same in every situation. It will vary with the organization, the situation and the individual’s view of the business situation. The rationality, therefore, is a multi-dimensional concept. For example, the business decisions in a private organization and a Public Sector Undertaking differ under the head of rationality. The reason for this difference in rationality is the different objectives of the decision makers. Any business decision if asked to be reviewed by a share-holder, a consumer, an employee, a supplier and a social scientist, will result in a different criticism with reference to their individual rationality.This is because each one of them will view the situation in different contexts and the motive with the different objectives. Hence, whether a decision is right or wrong depends on a specific rational view.

Simon Herbert differentiates among the types of rationality. A decision, in a given situation is:

•Objectively rational if it maximizes the value of the objective.

•Subjectively rational if it maximizes the attainment of value in relation to the knowledge and awareness of the subject.

•Consciously rational to the extent the process of the decision making is a conscious one.

•Organizationally rational to the degree of the orientation towards the organization.

•Personally rational to the extent it achieves an individual’s personal goals.

In other words, so long as the decision maker can explain with logic and reason, the objectivity and the circumstances in which the decision is made, it can be termed as a rational decision.

Whether the rationality applied is appropriate or not could be a point for debate. GrossBertram M* suggests three dimensions of rationality.

1.First, the degree of satisfaction of human interest.

2.Second, the degree of feasibility in achieving the objectives.

3.Third, a consistency in decision making. If a decision maker shows a consistent behavior in the process of decision making, then one can say that he meets the test of the rationality.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18046759/Chapter-2-various-concepts-of-MIS

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advantages and Disadvantages of EIS Advantages of EIS Easy for upper-level executives to use, extensive computer experience is not required in operations Provides timely delivery of company summary information Information that is provided is better understood Filters data for management Improves to tracking information Offers efficiency to decision makers Disadvantages of EIS System dependent Limited functionality, by design Information overload for some managers Benefits hard to quantify High implementation costs System may become slow, large, and hard to manage Need good internal processes for data management May lead to less reliable and less secure data
1 comment
Read more

Inter-Organizational Value Chain

The value chain of   a company is part of over all value chain. The over all competitive advantage of an organization is not just dependent on the quality and efficiency of the company and quality of products but also upon the that of its suppliers and wholesalers and retailers it may use. The analysis of overall supply chain is called the value system. Different parts of the value chain 1.  Supplier     2.  Firm       3.   Channel 4 .   Buyer
Post a Comment
Read more

Big-M Method and Two-Phase Method

Big-M Method The Big-M method of handling instances with artificial  variables is the “commonsense approach”. Essentially, the notion is to make the artificial variables, through their coefficients in the objective function, so costly or unprofitable that any feasible solution to the real problem would be preferred, unless the original instance possessed no feasible solutions at all. But this means that we need to assign, in the objective function, coefficients to the artificial variables that are either very small (maximization problem) or very large (minimization problem); whatever this value,let us call it Big M . In fact, this notion is an old trick in optimization in general; we  simply associate a penalty value with variables that we do not want to be part of an ultimate solution(unless such an outcome is unavoidable). Indeed, the penalty is so costly that unless any of the  respective variables' inclusion is warranted algorithmically, such variables will never be p
Post a Comment
Read more