Skip to main content

WHY AN MIS MIGHT FAIL?

MIS systems are complex and expensive pieces of software, and many people are involved with the design both within the organisation and from outside. Often they are built by software houses to the precise requirements of the organisation. So the client organisation needs to be very clear as to what it wants, and the software house analysts need also to be very clear about the requirements.

MIS failures can be expensive and bring bad publicity to all parties. They can arise due to:

  • Inadequate analysis - problems, needs and constraints aren’t understood in the early stages.
  • Lack of management involved in the design – wrong expectations of a new system / no-one understands the system.
  • Emphasis on the computer system – Need procedures for handling input and output / select the right hardware and software
  • Concentration on low-level data processing – Information must be easily accessible and understood
  • Lack of management knowledge of ICT systems and capabilities – managers know what they want from the system but don’t understand the technology
  • Lack of teamwork – An ICT manager must co-ordinate the accounts, marketing, sales etc. departments and help everyone understand the benefits of the system
  • Lack of professional standards – All systems need clear documentation that all users can understand (not just the ICT literate)

Organisations can judge how successful the implementation of an MIS system has been by applying the following evaluations:

  • High level of use - Is it actually used? Some systems don’t become operational for reasons such as it taking too long to enter data.
  • High level of user satisfaction - Do users like the systems?
  • Accomplishment of original objectives - Have the objectives specified in the analysis stage been achieved?
  • Appropriate nature of use - Is the software being correctly used?

Has proper training been given?

  • Institutionalisation of the system - Has it been taken on board enthusiastically?

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advantages and Disadvantages of EIS Advantages of EIS Easy for upper-level executives to use, extensive computer experience is not required in operations Provides timely delivery of company summary information Information that is provided is better understood Filters data for management Improves to tracking information Offers efficiency to decision makers Disadvantages of EIS System dependent Limited functionality, by design Information overload for some managers Benefits hard to quantify High implementation costs System may become slow, large, and hard to manage Need good internal processes for data management May lead to less reliable and less secure data
1 comment
Read more

Inter-Organizational Value Chain

The value chain of   a company is part of over all value chain. The over all competitive advantage of an organization is not just dependent on the quality and efficiency of the company and quality of products but also upon the that of its suppliers and wholesalers and retailers it may use. The analysis of overall supply chain is called the value system. Different parts of the value chain 1.  Supplier     2.  Firm       3.   Channel 4 .   Buyer
Post a Comment
Read more

Big-M Method and Two-Phase Method

Big-M Method The Big-M method of handling instances with artificial  variables is the “commonsense approach”. Essentially, the notion is to make the artificial variables, through their coefficients in the objective function, so costly or unprofitable that any feasible solution to the real problem would be preferred, unless the original instance possessed no feasible solutions at all. But this means that we need to assign, in the objective function, coefficients to the artificial variables that are either very small (maximization problem) or very large (minimization problem); whatever this value,let us call it Big M . In fact, this notion is an old trick in optimization in general; we  simply associate a penalty value with variables that we do not want to be part of an ultimate solution(unless such an outcome is unavoidable). Indeed, the penalty is so costly that unless any of the  respective variables' inclusion is warranted algorithmically, such variables will never be p
Post a Comment
Read more