Skip to main content

Rule of Thumb

Rule of  "72 "  

  
If you divide the number 72 by the rate of interest, you get to know the number of years it will take for you to double the money 72:  is sort of a magic number of personal finance, a.k.a known  as the rule of 72 in  personal finance parlance. All you  need to do is a quick calculation (mentally if you know  fifth grade math tables) and you can verify, if the cheeky  agent is giving you hogwash. 
 
 *Years:* If  you divide the number 72 by the rate of interest, you get to know the number of years it will take for you to double the > money. For instance, if the rate of interest is 9%, simply  divide the number 72 by 9% and the answer is eight. This is  the number of years it will take to double your money if you  invest it at 9% rate of interest.

  
 *Interest:**  *This rule works in reverse order as well. Lets say, you  know the number of years you want to double your money in  and want to know the minimum rate of interest which you need> to achieve that goal. So let's say, you have Rs 2.5 lakh  today and need to fund your son's college education with Rs 5 lakh in five years. Just divide the number 72 by 5 and  the answer is 14.41%. This shows that you will need to > invest your money in an instrument where you earn at least  14.4% as rate of interest, if you want to double the funds  in five years.
  
 *Inflation:* This rule also helps you understand a thing or two about inflation.  It helps you calculate the amount of time it will take  for inflation to make the real value of money half. So, lets say that the average inflation is 7%.  When you divide 72 by 7, the answer is 10.28. So, if you have Rs 1 lakh in your kitty today, it would take around 10.28 year for the value of the money to be halved.  Keep in mind, that this  is a rule of thumb and can be used to get rough results on  money related calculations. Now that you know a little more
 about the number 72 and its rule, use it while dealing with  your agents for quick verification of facts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advantages and Disadvantages of EIS Advantages of EIS Easy for upper-level executives to use, extensive computer experience is not required in operations Provides timely delivery of company summary information Information that is provided is better understood Filters data for management Improves to tracking information Offers efficiency to decision makers Disadvantages of EIS System dependent Limited functionality, by design Information overload for some managers Benefits hard to quantify High implementation costs System may become slow, large, and hard to manage Need good internal processes for data management May lead to less reliable and less secure data
1 comment
Read more

Inter-Organizational Value Chain

The value chain of   a company is part of over all value chain. The over all competitive advantage of an organization is not just dependent on the quality and efficiency of the company and quality of products but also upon the that of its suppliers and wholesalers and retailers it may use. The analysis of overall supply chain is called the value system. Different parts of the value chain 1.  Supplier     2.  Firm       3.   Channel 4 .   Buyer
Post a Comment
Read more

Big-M Method and Two-Phase Method

Big-M Method The Big-M method of handling instances with artificial  variables is the “commonsense approach”. Essentially, the notion is to make the artificial variables, through their coefficients in the objective function, so costly or unprofitable that any feasible solution to the real problem would be preferred, unless the original instance possessed no feasible solutions at all. But this means that we need to assign, in the objective function, coefficients to the artificial variables that are either very small (maximization problem) or very large (minimization problem); whatever this value,let us call it Big M . In fact, this notion is an old trick in optimization in general; we  simply associate a penalty value with variables that we do not want to be part of an ultimate solution(unless such an outcome is unavoidable). Indeed, the penalty is so costly that unless any of the  respective variables' inclusion is warranted algorithmically, such variables will never be p
Post a Comment
Read more